Aden: In a move that has been labeled a national betrayal, the Yemeni government is participating in military maneuvers in the occupied city of Umm al-Rashrash, known as “Eilat,” alongside Israeli forces and under American sponsorship. This participation is seen as a clear sign of normalization and subservience to foreign colonial interests in the region.
According to Yemen News Agency, Yemen has historically opposed any form of normalization with Israel, maintaining a steadfast position on the Palestinian cause. However, the current Yemeni government, referred to as the “hotel government,” is accused of implementing foreign agendas and disregarding the suffering of Yemenis who face aggression and a continued siege.
Critics argue that instead of defending Yemen’s sovereignty, the government is engaged in military activities that benefit the Zionist occupation, strengthening its influence in the Red Sea. This participation is viewed as part of a broader plan to expand Israeli influence, exploiting internal divisions in Arab countries. The involvement of Yemeni forces is seen as legitimizing Israel’s military presence in the region, threatening regional stability.
The accusation extends to claims that the government is following an American-Zionist agenda, neglecting Yemeni interests and national dignity. Previously tied to the Saudi-Emirati coalition, the government is now criticized for supporting Zionist projects, aiming to reshape the Red Sea’s geopolitical landscape in favor of Israel.
The move has sparked outrage among national and societal groups in Yemen, who condemn it as a betrayal. They argue that the government does not represent the Yemeni people, who have resisted aggression for years. Meanwhile, the government has remained silent, suggesting its decisions are influenced by foreign backers rather than national interests.
Despite these developments, the Yemeni populace remains resolute against normalization efforts. Historically resistant to such moves, Yemenis continue to uphold their sovereignty and dignity, refusing to engage in deals perceived as compromising their future with the Zionist entity.