Yemen: Over the course of twelve years, the Saudi enemy's gambles have shattered against the walls of Yemeni steadfastness. The "decisive battle" announced in March 2015 has transformed into a quagmire of military and economic attrition-a bitter cup the House of Saud is forced to drink, a consequence of an arrogance fueled by American, British, and Israeli support.
According to Yemen News Agency, developments on the ground and the Armed Forces' focused strategic strikes have demonstrated the Yemenis' ability to impose new deterrence equations. These have dismantled Saudi ambitions of expansion and domination, inflicting successive losses upon the aggressor across all fronts and levels.
The Yemen-Saudi conflict is not a recent phenomenon; it is rooted in a history of attempts to exert influence, establish hegemony, and expand territorially at the expense of Yemen's geography and sovereignty. Within this context, the Tanuma Massacre of 1338 AH (1920 CE) stands out as one of the most heinous historical testimonies to the hostile and criminal nature of the Saudi stance toward Yemen and its people.
This tragic history is organically linked to the present reality; today's aggression and blockade are merely a continuation of the bloodshed exemplified by the Tanuma Massacre. The objectives remain unchanged-stripping Yemen of its sovereignty and seizing control of its resources-with the only shift occurring in the tools of killing and the methods of confrontation.
The qualitative military advancement Yemen has achieved in record time marks a pivotal turning point in the region's history. The Yemeni Armed Forces have established new equations of deterrence and political balances, imposed over years of confrontation with the forces of global arrogance.
A careful analysis of the military operations reveals an escalating Yemeni strategy that successfully shifted the course of the war: moving from a defensive posture to absorbing attacks, and finally to inflicting successive strategic losses upon the Saudi, American, and Israeli enemies.
Repeated attempts to seize control of the liberated areas served merely as a testing ground for the steadfastness of the Armed Forces, which thwarted all plans for advancement and occupation-despite the disparity in capabilities. This transformed dreams of a quick victory into a nightmare of perpetual attrition, shattering the enemy's gambles and upending their battlefield calculations.
Yemen's strategic shifts were manifested in the breaking of the war's traditional equation by taking the battle deep into Saudi territory. This was achieved through focused, precision strikes targeting economic and vital facilities, particularly the energy sector and oil infrastructure.
The imposition of these Yemeni military equations today is a direct, on-the-ground response to years of Saudi targeting of civilian sites and infrastructure in Yemen. A new equation has taken hold: the enemy's economic security is now inextricably linked to halting the aggression, lifting the blockade, recovering national wealth, reclaiming rights, and driving Saudi occupation forces out of Yemeni territory.
Recent developments on the ground-particularly in the West Coast districts-confirm the inability of Saudi-backed military buildups and formations to alter the rules of engagement.
Attempts to advance have been shattered by military tactics relying on surprise and high-level coordination among various Armed Forces units, most notably the missile and drone forces.
Repelling the Saudi-aligned enemy's troop buildups in the coastal regions was not merely a localized battlefield victory; it further underscored the failure of the Saudi, American, and Israeli strategy to decisively win the battle for their local proxies.
